Wife’s Statements About Husband’s Impotency in Divorce Case Not Defamatory, Rules Bombay High Court

Shahin Akhtar

The Bombay High Court has delivered a significant verdict, ruling that a wife’s statements about her husband’s impotency during a divorce or maintenance case do not constitute defamation. Justice SM Modak’s decision emphasizes that such allegations are protected under Indian law if made in the context of a genuine legal dispute between spouses.

The Court observed that the wife’s allegations about her husband’s impotency were relevant to her claims of mental cruelty and neglect, and were therefore justified. The ruling is based on the “Ninth Exception” to Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which deals with defamation. According to this exception, statements made in good faith, in the interest of the person making them, or for the public good, are not considered defamatory.

The case involved a husband who had filed a defamation complaint against his wife, alleging that her statements about his sexual ability were hurtful and damaging to his reputation. However, the Magistrate Court had initially dismissed the husband’s complaint, stating that the wife’s statements were made during a legal proceeding and did not amount to defamation.

The Bombay High Court’s decision highlights the importance of allowing spouses to make allegations about each other in matrimonial disputes, without fear of being prosecuted for defamation. The Court emphasized that the wife’s statements were directly related to her claims of cruelty and neglect, and were therefore protected by law.

The verdict provides clarity on the law of defamation in the context of matrimonial disputes and underscores the need for courts to carefully consider the context in which such allegations are made. The ruling is likely to have significant implications for future cases, providing guidance to courts on how to approach similar disputes.

The Court’s decision to rule in favor of the wife and cancel the Sessions Court’s remand order demonstrates its commitment to upholding the law and protecting the rights of individuals involved in matrimonial disputes. By allowing spouses to make allegations about each other in good faith, the Court is ensuring that parties can present their cases freely, without fear of reprisal, in order to ensure that justice is served.

Case Name: Mrs. Piyanka Vijay Gwalani v. Mr. Vijay Inderlal Gwalani

Case No.: Crl. Writ Petition No. 2686/2024

Bench: Justice S.M. Modak

Click here to access the order

Instagram: Click here

LinkedIn: Click here