Nithyakalyani Narayanan. V On July 12th, the Supreme Court gave the verdict that the selection process of the Kerala High Court for recruiting District Judges in 2017 was in violation of the Kerala High Judicial Services Rules of 1961. However, Read more
Nithyakalyani Narayanan. V The Supreme Court was hearing the writ of mandamus filed by a former Additional Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh against the State Government to clear his outstanding fees. The Court expressed its doubt on whether Article 32 Read more
Jahanvi Agarwal The Supreme Court held that with the exclusion of Mondays and Fridays, SC will start to consider the batch of petitions contesting the invalidation of Article 370 of the Constitution on 2nd August. A Constitution bench consisting of Read more
Jahanvi Agarwal Supreme Court judge, Justice BR Gavai observed that the top court’s Advocates-on-Record are being treated like postmen during the contempt proceedings against two advocates. The Justice anticipated that Advocates-on-Record only file petitions that have already been written by other Read more
Jahanvi Agarwal Supreme Court Judge Justice Krishna Murari is set to retire on 07.07.2023. At the farewell function held by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA)spoke on the sanctity of the Supreme Court as an institution: “The Supreme Court is not Read more
Jahanvi Agarwal The Supreme Court has recently served notice in a special leave petition (SLP) which was filed by the husband. The SLP challenged the court’s direction wherein the court allowed the plea of the wife who had accused the husband of adultery. Not Read more
Jahanvi Agarwal Recently, the Supreme Court of India was informed that drastic powers have been provided to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to investigate money laundering cases and that the powers provided have to be reined. The bench consisted of Justices AS Bopanna and MM Read more
Jahanvi Agarwal The Bar Council of India (BCI) has filed a petition before the Supreme Court of India stating that there are many cases relating to lawyer enrolment fees. The said cases are pending before the High Courts of Kerala, Read more
Nithyakalyani Narayanan. V The Supreme Court dismissed two PILs with costs for “re-classification of the caste system” and “phasing out of reservations gradually to make alternate reservation policy”. A Bench comprising of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha remarked Read more
Amit Agarwal A division bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta on Monday (3rd July) refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to set up National Commission for Men and stated that the petition portrayed a one-sided picture. “No Read more