Vanshika Bhalla On February 7, 2025, the Delhi High Court ruled that “Ratan Tata” is a well-known trademark deserving legal protection from unauthorized use, ensuring that the legacy and reputation associated with the name remain safeguarded against exploitation. The decision Read more
Rakia Imran On 10th February, 2025, a Single-Bench comprising Justice Mini Pushkarna of the Delhi High Court after observing the brand’s strong market presence, the Delhi High Court remarked that ‘Peter England’ has established itself as a distinctive and well-recognized Read more
Shreya Gupta On Friday, 7th February 2025, Delhi High Court issued an injunction against Rajat Srivastava, preventing him from hosting an award event under the name “Ratan Tata Icon Award.” This decision was made in response to a lawsuit filed Read more
Aastha Pareek The Delhi High Court on January 16, 2025, has taken a prima facie view that the denial of regular telephonic and electronic communication to prisoners involved in terrorist activities and offenses under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Read more
Jai Raj Bhati The Delhi High Court on 13th January 2025 declined to issue an interim injunction against Mahindra Last Mile Mobility, rejecting Gensol Electric Vehicles plea to restrain Mahindra from selling its newly launched electric vehicle (EV), “eZEO”. The Read more
Rakia Imran On 28th January 2025, the Delhi High Court directed the police to probe into journalist Rana Ayyub’s tweets on X on Hindu deities and Vinayak Damodar Savarkar that purportedly hurt and insulted the religious beliefs of Hindus. In Read more
Rakia Imran On 20th January 2025, a Bench comprising Justice Subramanium Prasad of the Delhi High Court observed that revisiting the same issue contradicts public policy, and courts must ensure that litigants are not subjected to repetitive litigation. This statement Read more
Rakia Imran Case Name Relief Granted to Ukrainian National for Exit Permit Citation W.P.(C) 342/2025 Decided on 14.01.2025 Coram HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA Petitioner AHLAIA NOHINA Respondent UNION OF INDIA & ORS Provisions Involved Section 14 of Read more
Rakia Imran A petition has been filed by seven BJP MLAs in the Delhi High Court, seeking an explanation for the delay by the AAP-led government in submitting 14 CAG reports to the Assembly. The petition claims that the Delhi Read more
Rehan Khan On 7th January, the Delhi High Court, while passing the ruling in Rajeev Shukla vs. Gopal Krishna Shukla clarified that filing an application under an incorrect legal provision constitutes a curable defect as long as it does not cause Read more
