Meenakshi Shukla
On 30th May, 2025, the Delhi High Court passed a decree in a trademark infringement suit between Titan Company Limited and Lenskart Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The bench comprising of Justice Amit Bansal decreed in favour of Titan Company Limited in the case of Titan Company Limited v. Lenskart Solutions Private Limited & Anr.
It brought a high-profile corporate dispute to a close on the very first day of hearing.
Titan, one of India’s most trusted brands in watches and accessories, took legal action against Lenskart, alleging unauthorised usage of its well-known registered trademarks “TITAN” and “FASTRACK” on Lenskart’s website.
The claims included the use of these trademarks not just in visible listings, but also embedded within the source code as metatags, a strategy often used to manipulate online search rankings.
On 30th May, 2025, the Delhi High Court passed a decree in a trademark infringement suit between Titan Company Limited and Lenskart Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The bench comprising of Justice Amit Bansal decreed in favour of Titan Company Limited in the case of Titan Company Limited v. Lenskart Solutions Private Limited & Anr.
Appearing on advance notice, Lenskart’s legal team, led by Mr. Nishchal Anand, admitted to the presence of Titan’s trademarks but attributed it to a “technical error.” Lenskart told the Court it had removed all references and would promptly take down any future listings if notified, asserting no intent to infringe and showing readiness to settle. He clarified:
“The defendants do not have the intention to infringe the plaintiff’s trademarks which are the subject matter of the present suit.”
Given the unequivocal submission, the Court noted that the defendants did not wish to contest the matter and proceeded to decree the suit on the first date of hearing, stating:
“Binding the defendants to the aforesaid statement, the suit is decreed.”
The Court also exempted Titan from paying court fees, recognising the matter had been disposed of at the outset:
“In view of the fact that the suit has been disposed of on the first date itself even prior to the issuance of summons, the plaintiff is exempted from paying the court fees.”
Taking this submission on record, Justice Amit Bansal decreed the suit in favour of Titan, without requiring further litigation or even the issuance of summons. Given the amicable resolution, the court also exempted Titan from paying court fees. The Court further disposed of the matter.
Case Name: Titan Company Limited v. Lenskart Solutions Private Limited & Anr
Case Details: CS(COMM) 589/2025 with I.A. 14380/2025, I.A. 14381/2025, I.A. 14382/2025, I.A. 14383/2025 & I.A. 14384/2025
Bench : Justice Amit Bansal
Click here to read the judgment
Instagram: Click here
LinkedIn: Click here
For Collaboration and Business: info.desikaanoon@gmail.com
