Radhika Mittal
A lawyer practicing in the Delhi High Court has been sentenced to four months in prison for making derogatory remarks about judges during an online hearing. The ruling, issued on November 6, 2024, underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining respect and decorum within court proceedings.
The incident occurred during a virtual hearing when the lawyer, whose identity has not been disclosed, made disparaging comments about the presiding judges through the chatbox feature. The remarks were deemed not only disrespectful but also baseless, prompting the court to take immediate action. The judges expressed concern that such behavior undermines the integrity of the judicial system and could lead to a broader erosion of respect for Court authority.
The bench in the present case comprised of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Amit Sharma who that lawyers, as officers of the Court, have a duty to uphold its dignity. The Court noted that while legal professionals are entitled to express their views, they must do so in a manner that respects judicial authority. The judges emphasized that contemptuous behavior cannot be tolerated and must be met with appropriate consequences to deter similar actions in the future.
In addition to the prison sentence, the lawyer was also fined ₹2,000. The Court ordered that he serve his sentence at Tihar Jail and directed jail authorities to ensure he receives necessary medical care during his incarceration.
This ruling serves as a significant reminder of the importance of maintaining decorum in legal proceedings. It sends a clear message to all legal practitioners about the standards of conduct expected within the courtroom. The judiciary’s firm stance on this matter aims to reinforce public confidence in the legal system and ensure that respect for judicial processes is upheld.
As this case unfolds, it will be crucial to observe its impact on courtroom behavior and legal practices in India. The decision may lead to increased awareness among lawyers regarding their responsibilities and conduct during hearings, both virtual and in-person.
The Delhi High Court’s decisive action against contemptuous behavior reflects its dedication to preserving the integrity of the judiciary. By imposing a custodial sentence on the offending lawyer, the court has taken a strong stand against any actions that threaten the respect and authority of judicial proceedings. This case serves as a pivotal moment in reinforcing the standards expected from legal professionals and ensuring that justice is administered with dignity and respect.
Case Name: Court on its own motion v. Sanjeev Kumar
Bench: Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Amit Sharma
Case Name: Court on its own motion v. Sanjeev Kumar