Anushri Joshi
The Supreme Court of India on October 21, 2024 ruled that an eviction order passed by the Estate Officer under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, does not prevent the parties from invoking an arbitration clause for resolving contractual disputes. This pivotal judgment was delivered by a Division Bench comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Sandeep Mehta, who emphasized the distinct legal framework governing statutory eviction procedures and contractual arbitration.
The case at hand involved a public premises lease dispute where, despite the Estate Officer’s eviction order under the Public Premises Act, one of the parties sought to initiate arbitration to resolve contractual disagreements, including financial claims and the renewal of the lease. The appellant challenged this move, arguing that the eviction order effectively terminated the contractual relationship, thereby nullifying the arbitration clause.
The Court rejected this contention, holding that the eviction order addresses only the question of physical possession of the premises and does not extinguish the parties’ rights under the arbitration clause of the lease agreement. The ruling was primarily based on Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which permits the appointment of an arbitrator upon application, even after statutory eviction has occurred.
Justice Narasimha clarified that the Public Premises Act and the Arbitration Act serve distinct purposes. While the former ensures swift recovery of public properties from unauthorized occupants, the latter governs the resolution of disputes arising from the terms of a contract. He further noted that the mere existence of an eviction order does not preclude arbitration proceedings on matters unrelated to possession, such as financial claims and contractual interpretation.
This ruling significantly strengthens the enforceability of arbitration clauses in lease agreements, particularly those involving public premises. It reinforces the autonomy of arbitration as a preferred method of dispute resolution and underscores the Court’s commitment to upholding contractual rights independent of statutory eviction processes.
Case title: Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr. Vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd.
Case no: 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754
Bench: Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Sandeep Mehta
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE ORDER